Rev A Brandram 

Edinburgh, 7th May 1845

 My Dear Friend,

            I now sit down to write you my first official letter from this new field of my travels, and in doing it I am reminded, that on your annual day last year I wrote you from a far foreign land, from Peto in Yucatán; & again I am reminded of God's merciful goodness to me in my then very poor state of health, his conducting me safely through that country to the coast borne for 300 miles on the shoulders of strangers, thence to Belize which is British ground, and thence again to New York, to Dover and London: again and further, for his restoring me to health, and in employing me in Bible work in my native country, and now in this very city from whence I started 27 years ago to visit and wander in foreign lands.

            Pray forgive this reminiscence, or rather the mentioning of it to you in an official letter. But I have an impression on my mind, and the same has often comforted me at great distances and in difficulties, namely, that yourself with the Committee have a kindly sympathy with your out labourers, that you rejoice and weep with them, and pray for them: and well it becomes us as diffusers of the Bible among our fellow creatures, to promote, extend and deepen all those blessed feelings of Christian charity and affection which the holy book we circulate recommends as the highest and best of gospel virtues.

            And now to business. It is about a month since I arrived in this city. The greater part of that time I have spent here, but have also during it paid two visits to Glasgow. I regret, I may say, my detention here, but yet believe that it has not been longer than necessary, and further believe that some more time might yet be spent here with profit to our general object. And with this understanding, though I leave this place tomorrow for Glasgow, I purpose afterwards to return to it, and to remain a few days in order to fully to complete the visitation. By way of strengthening my views in regard to the time occupied here, I may state that our good and worthy friend Dr. Paterson more than accords with me on the subject, and even thinks the time given to Edinburgh should be longer than I propose.

            My time has been occupied in a good measure in making private calls on former and present friends of our Society, and in explaining to them our present position and operations, and the present position of the world as to the want and need of the Bible. These representations have been coupled with kindly solicitations made to all for sympathy with us in our work, for their prayers, and their cooperation, and aid.

            Again, we have had several small meetings in the shape of Bible Society evening parties, and otherwise, and in these the same or similar representations and solicitations have been made.

            Finally, we held, two days ago a public meeting called by advertisements. The attendance was not numerous, partly because there were other public meetings held at the same time in this busy season, and partly because it was held during the day when the great many are entangled in their necessary occupations. We had with us one of the Ministers of the Established Church, and two of the Free Church body. These latter were our old and steady friend the Rev. Henry Grey, and the well known and valued Bombay Missionary the Rev. Dr. Wilson. Our old and worthy friends the Rev. Dr. John Brown and the Rev. William Innes were likewise with us. Also we had in our company Ministers representing the Episcopal Church, the Secession, and the Independents.

             We have hopes that good has been done, and have tried to avoid evil. We think that a good supply of your forthcoming Report would be of service, that we might distribute them among those who are friendly for their own use, and to show to those half friendly or less so, in order that they might see the quantity of seed sown, and also the sheaves that are already come in. 200 copies are wished for, and we beg you will be kind enough to arrange for us accordingly. But to this number I would add what may be required for Glasgow, and other places I may visit, say 300 more, in all 500 copies. Your note of the 5th has just come to hand. I observed the demur of the Committee on the subject I noticed to you; and probably your view of the matter is better than mine.

I hope to hear that you have had a very gratifying meeting today.

             I remain, My Dear Friend,

                         Yours Very Truly,

                                     James Thomson.

 Rev A Brandram

Edinburgh 17th May 1845

My Dear Friend

            Your letter of the 13th came duly to hand, and afforded me comfort by your condolence with me in the midst of Thistles, and which seem sharper and stronger than usual. I do not know whether to consider it a compliment to me or the reverse this extraordinary bristle up, but I know I should have been better pleased without it. And now every day the storm rises. The warning is in new papers this week in which it was not before, and it is issued moreover in a circular.

            I thank you much for your letter of the 15th received this morning, and containing information I wished much to have, but which I was afraid to ask.

            On comparing the accusations made with Pereira's Bible of 1828, and his Test. of 1823, we found our anti-friends exceedingly, but fortunately, inaccurate; but we were afraid there might be other editions of the Portuguese B. or T. in which their cited passages might be found verbatim. Your note however frees us of that danger, as I suppose you have looked into all your Port. B. or T.

            Pray, try to ascertain whence they have quoted, for surely they cannot have quoted from their own heads. Shortly before the warning appeared I learned that a printed note had been sent here from London per post, anonymous, containing these translation accusations. From whence they came I have little doubt, and I suppose you can guess also. Our friends here will presently learn that they have rested on a broken reed which will run into their hand.

            When the warning first appeared our Committee met to consider it, and resolved to make no reply. Now however they have summoned another meeting with a different intention, and a reply is most likely to be given, and I think it is required.

            I see in Almeida's Bible you give no headings, and rather wonder you should have left them out there where there was no danger, and kept them in in Pereira's where there is much danger, and now rather immediate as you see. Besides whoever was Editor should have brought these objectionable headings before you. My advice would be, to cut off with one fell sweep of the guillotine all these Roman Catholic heads together, I mean, of the chapters. As to changes of the text itself I think they shd. never be made without acknowledgement. And in this way you might perhaps remove all that is objectionable which is little, correcting one R.C. version by another.

            I have read over since I came here, not having it before, Mr. Radley's Pamphlet, and like it very much. I think some hundreds of these for circulation here would be very useful. Should a new edition be needed, perhaps he could embrace in it these present accusations.

            You have not observed, I think, the heading of Luke xx 11 in the Port. B. & T. There unfortunately is to be found the objectionable passage "Consecrates the bread & wine into his body and blood." We shall let the Ed. people find out this passage, and if they do, we will make due use of consecrates instead of transmutes. I trust you will take the headings of chapters into early consideration in the Committee, and by a Resolution on the subject enable us at once to say, that all these headings in every reprint will be omitted.

            I am glad to say that Dr. Wilson is very cordially with us, and is using his knowledge and his influence in our favour with the three names appended to the warning and connected with the Free Church, namely Candlish, Clason and Spiers.

            In the Edin. Committee itself we have at least two who are thoroughly on our side, besides some borders.

            I am, My Dear Friend,

                        Very Truly Yours,

                                    Jas. Thomson.

Rev A. Brandram

Aberdeen 4th August 1845

My Dear Friend,

I continue to you my narrative of occurring circumstances in this Scottish Bible tour. My last letter was dated St. Andrews July 9th and brought on matters as far as that place. On the same day on which the letter referred to was dated and sent off, I left St. Andrews, and returned to Dundee. There I saw the Editor of the Northern Warder, the newspaper noticed as having favourably and repeatedly spoken of our meetings. I learned from him that the Second Warning had been sent him for insertion. This was an extension of the Second Warning beyond the first, for it was not here advertised, and the putting of the Second in this paper was no doubt occasioned by our movements. This was throwing a shell with a particular aim.

From Dundee I went to Arbroath, and saw there the solid and extensive remnants of the once vast monastery which contained about 430 monks. I visited the different Ministers here, and went on to Montrose. Here a meeting was held, and the collection made in one of the United Secession Churches. The Minister of the other church connected with this body was, for a wonder, unfavourable to us. On the same side, and very distinctly, stood the two Ministers of the Free Church, one of whom is a half brother of the late Dr. Andrew Thomson. I called upon them both, and afterwards breakfasted with one of them. They each took a strong view on the points objected to by the Edinburgh Bible Society. Our interviews were long, and from disputed things we passed to things in which we agreed, and I shall long remember the pleasantness of our conversations in the Gospel of Christ, and in the things of the Kingdom of God. This same Mr. Thomson said we were quite right in advocating our cause in Scotland.

I called also on the two Ministers of the Established Church and found them both very friendly. They had, they said, for some time back been considering whether anything could be done by them in aid of your Society, and signified their readiness to have a sermon preached for you, and a collection made. The Wesleyans, Independents, and Baptists were also favourably disposed towards us.

In Montrose is one who left you a Legacy, which you have already received though the Testator yet liveth. I refer to Mr. Dorward, who became his own Executor, and paid you (as you would have been paid at his death) his legacy of £2000. I thought it an official duty to call upon this gentleman. He is aged and infirm, and still continues warmly attached to our cause.

I now returned to Arbroath to meet the engagements I had entered into in that place. On the former and present occasion I saw all the three Ministers of the Free Church, and found them all unfavourable, yet mild towards us though indisposed. They have more confidence they say in the Edinburgh Bible Society, and hold with that body in some at least of their objections. I thought I made some impression upon one of them, in reference to the aid we give to their missions in the East, pleading, as I said, that as a matter of justice, we should meet with some encouragement from them, and not the reverse. Another of the three said he entertained no feelings of opposition to our Society, and the third said he knew that our Society only was supplying the world.

In Arbroath I saw the Montrose newspaper, which while it noticed our Sunday meeting, took occasion to chant the Edinburgh chorus. However I learned at the same time that an article in our favour had come for insertion in the Arbroath newspaper, and to this I appended a column of information concerning our Society in its plans and operations.

The two Ministers of the Established Church in Arbroath I found well inclined toward us, and so were the Secession, Methodist, and Relief Ministers, the latter of whom, the Rev. William Allan, was particularly serviceable to me both in counsel and general help, and he is a member of the Edinburgh Bible Society here. In his church we held a meeting of Ministers, and some of their leading people, and all were represented except the Free Church. Our object was to form the nucleus of the Society in a committee consisting of Ministers of each denomination with one or two of their elders or deacons. This was a very pleasing meeting, and resulted in the formation of the intended committee, whose object is to pass into a Society as soon as circumstances will permit.

This finished my business in Arbroath. I then paid a short visit to Forfar, the capital of the County, where I met with friends to our object, and particularly in the Parish Minister, and something was done in furtherance of future operations. The short visit I also paid to Brechin. The two Ministers of the Established Church were very favourable to us, and one or perhaps two of the Free Church Ministers were rather favourably inclined also. I called on the Bishop, but he told me he subscribed to the Propagation and Christian Knowledge Societies, and that that was all he could do.

I again returned to Montrose, and visiting those friendly mentioned what had been done in Arbroath, and begged they would form themselves into a committee after a similar manner, to which they said they would give their attention.

Aberdeen came next in order, and this Capital of the North, and the third town in Scotland required some days for due operations. I had feared for things here, having learned that the Edinburgh spirit prevailed strong. I found things better however than report had led me to expect. The first favourable circumstance in regard to Aberdeen is, that we have more Free Church Ministers on our side than anywhere else as far as I have yet been. Two of the Secretaries of our Auxiliary there are Free Church Ministers, and some half dozen altogether we can count as our warm supporters. The strongest party on the Edinburgh side are also Free Church Ministers. In my rounds I visited these as well as others, and was very agreeably disappointed in finding them much less opposed than I imagined. The Established Church Ministers are with us, and so are the Dissenters, and not least the Baptist Minister. We held three meetings. The first was in one of the Free Churches, the second in one of the Established Churches, and the third in an Independent Chapel. The first was on a Sunday, the second was to form an Established Church Association in conjunction with our Society, and the third was a general meeting of the Auxiliary. At this general meeting we had three Free Church Ministers present, and what was both curious and gratifying was that one of them was a strong Edinburgh Bible Society man, but of a different spirit from his friends in Edinburgh, judging from what I saw of him at the meeting, and privately before in his own house. This gentleman is the Editor of a Free Church newspaper here, and in his paper issued on the morning of the day on which we met, he gave notice of our meeting and recommended the people to attend. He told us when he came to the meeting that he was acting inconsistently in coming, as well as in having told others to come. But we said that he was acting very consistently and helping forward the Bible cause in any way. – We have observed some of the newspapers take friendly notice of the meetings we hold, and in the one most extensively circulated there will appear a long article about our Society next week. What the Banner of the Free Church will say that next issue, I know not, but should like to see, and may perhaps see.

This finished Aberdeen. That is a branch of this Society In Inverury, and I thought it a duty to pay our friends there a visit, not to get money, but to give encouragement. We had a meeting in the Independent Chapel which was fairly attended considering that there was another meeting at the time. The people were pleased at the visit paid them, and were glad to hear of the Society's movement in the various parts of the world. We can hardly say that we have either the Free or Unfree Church with us here, though they keep from us on quite different grounds. The Free Church Minister in an adjoining parish is warmly for us, and attends the meetings of this Association.

Today I returned from Inverury to this city, and tomorrow morning early I go to Peterhead. – In returning here, and just before leaving the place, I would mention two things more or less connected with it. The first is, that in visiting the Rev. Sir William Dunbar,  I found, contrary to my expectations, that he was not quite favourable to us, though far from being against us. His main objection seems to be our want of Prayer, and this coming from a Church of England clergyman was the more remarkable. In Scotland generally our difficulty is not understood, and Socinians are always supposed to be the cause of this want. Sir William however could well understand the matter, but he said he would have prayer, leave the Society who would.

The next thing is in regard to Dr. Wilson, the missionary from Bombay. You already know from what I wrote from Edinburgh that he is very favourable to us, and this you know also from himself by interviews and otherwise. I have mentioned on several occasions to Free Church Ministers Dr. Wilson's confidence in us, and his willingness to aid us. On some of these occasions it was suggested to me, that some statement from him in writing would be useful, as he has great weight in the Free Church. I wrote Dr. Wilson regarding this, and have had a note from him, expressing, that the Society is "entitled to the confidence of the friends of evangelical religion in Britain, and to the kindly and not unfriendly remonstrance of those who may have to suggest improvements in any department of its operations." This document I have found serviceable here, and doubt not but I shall find it so in various places as I move onward.

            I remain, My Dear Friend, Yours Very Truly,

                                                                        James Thomson.

P.S. Since finishing this letter, I have learned, that the Second Warning was published in the Banner, and I have seen it. This was throwing a shell before us; but it seems to have had little effect.

Rev A Brandram

            Inverness, 15th Aug. 1845

My Dear Friend,

            Your communications on the 31st July, and of the 4th and 6th inst. have come into my hands since I last wrote you on the 1st of this month. The two latter of these came to me duly, the first unduly, as I got it in Forres on the 12th instant on my arriving there, and it had come from Aberdeen on the preceding day, according to the post mark. The London and Edinburgh marks were not visible.

            In regard to any portions of my letters appearing in the Monthly Extracts, I should think it better not, and for two reasons, first because my letters are not exactly in the shape it would be proper to publish, and secondly, I think it would be better not to say anything at all at present. If you wish it, I can draw up something when my tour is finished that may be general, and embracing the whole visitation.

            I stated that two thirds of Scotland are for us. I exclude Edinburgh from the calculation, though I do not know that I should. From all I have seen out of Edinburgh I am sure two thirds are for us, and further, that the other third, bating a few, are not against us. You fear I shall be followed by violent disclaimers and writers. It may possibly be so, but I hope and think not. I mentioned that I had been shot at, and that a shot had been fired before me, but both seem to have been innoxious. All the newspapers in our way have spoken favourably, with the exception of one titbit from a Journal of minor name. The passage enforced there, and I think the only one quoted from the Warning, was the heading of Luke xxii, and it stumbled a little a warm friend of our Society. I do think, even notwithstanding all you have well observed on this wording, that it would be well to amend it in the manner I before hinted. The objection is not at all to the word consecrates. – The Banner of Aberdeen said not a word about us after our meeting, which was saying something for us.

            Vindex's second letter I have not yet seen. I hope no fuel will be given him for a third. I agree with you fully, "Answer him not."

            You have not done Dr. Wilson justice. He has no idea at all, that I know of, of writing remonstrances to you or against you. He is very friendly, and his allusion was, to blame the Edinburgh people for unfriendly remonstrances seeing they had them to make, and he says they should have been kindly. I expect to see him here in a few days.

            Have you seen the Rev. Christopher Anderson's two thick volumes, entitled The History of the English Bible, or a name akin to this? He told me in May that they would appear in London in the end of that month.

            I arrived here yesterday, and am working my way. The General Assembly of the Free Church meets here, by adjournment from Edinburgh in a few days. I intend to work as I can among its members. In a subsequent letter I shall take up my narrative from Aberdeen.

            I remain,

                        Yours Very Truly,

                                    James Thomson.